1. Academic Validation
  2. Epigenetic remodeling to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in human glioblastoma: pre-clinical evidence for development of new immunotherapy approaches

Epigenetic remodeling to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in human glioblastoma: pre-clinical evidence for development of new immunotherapy approaches

  • J Transl Med. 2024 Mar 1;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05040-x.
Maria Fortunata Lofiego 1 Francesca Piazzini 1 Francesca Pia Caruso 2 3 Francesco Marzani 1 Laura Solmonese 4 Emma Bello 1 Fabrizio Celesti 1 Maria Claudia Costa 2 3 Teresa Noviello 2 5 6 Roberta Mortarini 7 Andrea Anichini 7 Michele Ceccarelli 2 5 6 Sandra Coral 1 Anna Maria Di Giacomo 1 4 Michele Maio 1 4 Alessia Covre 8 EPigenetic Immune-oncology Consortium Airc (EPICA) investigators
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • 2 BIOGEM Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ariano Irpino, Italy.
  • 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • 4 Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • 5 Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • 6 Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • 7 Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • 8 University of Siena, Siena, Italy. alessia.covre2@unisi.it.
Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor, that is refractory to standard treatment and to immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Noteworthy, melanoma brain metastases (MM-BM), that share the same niche as GBM, frequently respond to current ICI therapies. Epigenetic modifications regulate GBM cellular proliferation, invasion, and prognosis and may negatively regulate the cross-talk between malignant cells and immune cells in the tumor milieu, likely contributing to limit the efficacy of ICI therapy of GBM. Thus, manipulating the tumor epigenome can be considered a therapeutic opportunity in GBM.

Methods: Microarray transcriptional and methylation profiles, followed by gene set enrichment and IPA analyses, were performed to study the differences in the constitutive expression profiles of GBM vs MM-BM cells, compared to the extracranial MM cells and to investigate the modulatory effects of the DNA hypomethylating agent (DHA) guadecitabine among the different tumor cells. The prognostic relevance of DHA-modulated genes was tested by COX analysis in a TCGA GBM patients' cohort.

Results: The most striking differences between GBM and MM-BM cells were found to be the enrichment of biological processes associated with tumor growth, invasion, and extravasation with the inhibition of MHC class II antigen processing/presentation in GBM cells. Treatment with guadecitabine reduced these biological differences, shaping GBM cells towards a more immunogenic phenotype. Indeed, in GBM cells, promoter hypomethylation by guadecitabine led to the up-regulation of genes mainly associated with activation, proliferation, and migration of T and B cells and with MHC class II antigen processing/presentation. Among DHA-modulated genes in GBM, 7.6% showed a significant prognostic relevance. Moreover, a large set of immune-related upstream-regulators (URs) were commonly modulated by DHA in GBM, MM-BM, and MM cells: DHA-activated URs enriched for biological processes mainly involved in the regulation of cytokines and chemokines production, inflammatory response, and in Type I/II/III IFN-mediated signaling; conversely, DHA-inhibited URs were involved in metabolic and proliferative pathways.

Conclusions: Epigenetic remodeling by guadecitabine represents a promising strategy to increase the efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapy of GBM, supporting the rationale to develop new epigenetic-based immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of this still highly deadly disease.

Keywords

Brain metastases; DNA hypomethylating agent; Glioblastoma; Immunotherapy; Melanoma.

Figures
Products