1. Academic Validation
  2. Silodosin inhibits the growth of bladder cancer cells and enhances the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin via ELK1 inactivation

Silodosin inhibits the growth of bladder cancer cells and enhances the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin via ELK1 inactivation

  • Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;5(10):2959-68.
Takashi Kawahara 1 Hiroki Ide 2 Eiji Kashiwagi 2 John D Patterson 2 Satoshi Inoue 2 Hasanain Khaleel Shareef 3 Ali Kadhim Aljarah 4 Yichun Zheng 2 Alexander S Baras 2 Hiroshi Miyamoto 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA ; Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama, Japan.
  • 2 Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 3 Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA ; Department of Biology, University of Babylon College of Science for Women Babylon, Iraq.
  • 4 Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA ; Department of Biology, University of Baghdad College of Science Baghdad, Iraq.
PMID: 26693052
Abstract

Silodosin, a selective α1A-adrenergic blocker prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, was previously shown to decrease the expression of ELK1, a c-fos proto-oncogene regulator and a well-described downstream target of the PKC/Raf-1/ERK pathway, in human prostate smooth muscle cells. PKC/Raf-1/ERK activation has also been implicated in drug resistance. In the current study, we assessed the effects of silodosin on ELK1 expression/activity in bladder Cancer cells as well as on their proliferation in the presence or absence of chemotherapeutic drugs, including cisplatin and gemcitabine. In bladder Cancer cell lines, silodosin reduced the expression of ELK1 (mRNA/protein) and its downstream target, c-fos gene, as well as the transcriptional activity of ELK1. While silodosin alone (up to 10 μM) insignificantly affected the growth of bladder Cancer cells cultured in androgen depleted conditions or those expressing ELK1-short hairpin RNA, it considerably inhibited the viability of Androgen Receptor (AR)-positive/ELK1-positive cells in the presence of androgens. Silodosin also inhibited the migration of ELK1-positive cells with or without a functional AR, but not that of ELK1 knockdown cells. Interestingly, silodosin treatment or ELK1 silencing resulted in increases in drug sensitivity to cisplatin, but not to gemcitabine, even in AR-negative cells or AR-positive cells cultured in an androgen-depleted condition. In addition, silodosin decreased the expression of NF-κB, a key regulator of chemoresistance, and its transcriptional activity. Moreover, immunohistochemistry in bladder Cancer specimens from patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed that phospho-ELK1 positivity strongly correlated with chemoresistance. Silodosin was thus found to not only inhibit cell viability and migration but also enhance the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin in bladder Cancer lines via inactivating ELK1. Our results suggest that combined treatment with silodosin is useful for overcoming chemoresistance in patients with ELK1-positive urothelial carcinoma receiving cisplatin.

Keywords

ELK1; bladder cancer; cisplatin; drug sensitivity; silodosin; α1A-adrenergic blocker.

Figures
Products