1. Academic Validation
  2. A phase 2 study of the sphingosine-1-phosphate antibody sonepcizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

A phase 2 study of the sphingosine-1-phosphate antibody sonepcizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

  • Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):576-582. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30393.
Sumanta K Pal 1 Harry A Drabkin 2 James A Reeves 3 John D Hainsworth 4 Susan E Hazel 5 Dario A Paggiarino 5 Jon Wojciak 5 Gary Woodnutt 5 Rupal S Bhatt 6
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • 3 Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, Florida.
  • 4 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • 5 Lpath Inc, San Diego, California.
  • 6 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract

Background: Upregulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) may mediate resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapies and inhibit antitumor immunity. Antagonism of S1P in preclinical models appears to overcome this resistance. In this phase 2 study, the authors assessed the activity of sonepcizumab, a first-in-class inhibitor of S1P, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with a history of prior VEGF-directed therapy.

Methods: Patients were required to have clear cell mRCC and to have received treatment with at least 1 prior VEGF-directed agent. Prior treatment with immunotherapeutic agents and ≤1 mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors was permitted. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival. Additional endpoints included response rate and safety, and overall survival (OS) performed post hoc.

Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled with a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-5 prior therapies), 78% of whom had intermediate-risk disease by second-line International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. Although the current study did not achieve its primary endpoint based on the 2-month progression-free survival, a median OS of 21.7 months was observed. Four patients (10%) demonstrated a partial response, with a median duration of response of 5.9 months. No grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in >5% of patients (adverse events were graded and recorded for each patient using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]); the most frequent grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (30%), weight gain (18%), constipation (15%), and nausea (15%). Biomarker studies demonstrated an increase in S1P concentrations with therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling of 3 patients with a clinical benefit of >24 months indicated von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and polybromo-1 (PBRM1) alterations.

Conclusions: The encouraging OS and favorable safety profile observed with sonepcizumab should prompt further investigation of the agent in combination with VEGF-directed agents or checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer 2017;123:576-582. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; resistance; sonepcizumab; sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P).

Figures
Products