1. Academic Validation
  2. Novel antiproliferative agents bearing substituted thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold as dual VEGFR-2 and BRAF kinases inhibitors and apoptosis inducers; design, synthesis and molecular docking

Novel antiproliferative agents bearing substituted thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold as dual VEGFR-2 and BRAF kinases inhibitors and apoptosis inducers; design, synthesis and molecular docking

  • Bioorg Chem. 2022 Aug;125:105861. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105861.
Rasha A Hassan 1 Mohammed I A Hamed 2 Amr M Abdou 3 Yara El-Dash 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt. Electronic address: rasha.hasan@pharma.cu.edu.eg.
  • 2 Department of Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.
  • 3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt.
  • 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Abstract

A series of novel thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives was designed and synthesized based on multitarget directed drug design strategy. All the newly synthesized compounds were evaluated for their antiproliferative activity in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) against a panel of 60 tumor cell lines. Compounds 4a and 4b showed a significant antiproliferative activity at 10 µM dose, and were accordingly evaluated at five dose concentrations. They showed potent and broad-spectrum antiproliferative activity, with GI50 values in the micromolar range of 1.44-6.93 µM and 1.66-5.82 µM, respectively. They also showed TGI values in the cytostatic range of 3.49-97.3 µM and 3.33-77.3 µM respectively. These two compounds potently inhibited VEGFR-2 with IC50 = 0.111 ± 0.006 and 0.049 ± 0.003 µM, BRafV600E with IC50 = 0.089 ± 0.005 and 0.063 ± 0.003 µM and BRafWT IC50 = 0.071 ± 0.004 and 0.05 ± 0.003 µM, respectively in comparison to sorafenib IC50 values of 0.031 ± 0.002, 0.035 ± 0.002 and 0.021 ± 0.001 µM against VEGFR-2, BRafV600E and BRafWT, respectively. Compounds 4a and 4b showed also potent down-regulation of total VEGFR-2 and phosphorylated VEGFR-2. In addition, the HUVECs migratory potential was greatly reduced resulting in significantly disrupted wound healing patterns after treatment with compounds 4a and 4b for 72 h. Furthermore, Compounds 4a and 4b induced Apoptosis by 22.82- and 25.81-fold increase in the total Apoptosis percentage in breast Cancer MCF7 cell line. This apoptotic activity was supported by an increase in the level of apoptotic caspase-9 by 6.17- and 9.07-fold, respectively. Moreover, the cell cycle analysis showed that compounds 4a and 4b arrested the cell cycle mainly in the G1 and G1/S phases, respectively. The molecular modeling studies were performed to assess the binding pattern and affinity of derivatives 4a and 4b toward the VEGFR-2 and BRaf active sites.

Keywords

Antiproliferative activity; Apoptosis; BRAF; Caspase 9; Cell cycle analysis; Molecular modeling; Synthesis; Thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine; VEGFR-2; Wound healing.

Figures
Products