1. Academic Validation
  2. The value of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

The value of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

  • BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00737-2.
Bo Zhang # 1 Bingjie Zhang # 2 Zhulin Zhou 3 Yutong Guo 4 Dan Wang 5
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, China.
  • 2 Department of Ophthalmology, First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, China.
  • 3 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 4 St. Erik Eye hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 5 Department of Ophthalmology, First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 1 Xinmin Street, Changchun, 130021, Jilin, China. w_dan@jlu.edu.cn.
  • # Contributed equally.
Abstract

Objective: Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has obvious clinical value in the diagnosis of diabetes, but the conclusions on the diagnostic value of diabetic retinopathy (DR) are not consistent. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy through the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.

Methods: Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched until November, 2020. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated by Stata 15.0 software.

Results: After screening, 18 high-quality papers were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the combined DOR = 18.19 (95% CI: 10.99-30.11), the sensitivity= 0.81 (95% CI): 0.75 ~ 0.87), specificity = 0.81 (95%CI: 0.72 ~ 0.87), +LR = 4.2 (95%CI: 2.95 ~ 6.00), -LR = 0.23 (95%CI: 0.17 ~ 0.31), and the area under the Summary ROC curve was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.85 ~ 0.90).

Conclusion: The overall accuracy of HbA1cC forin diagnosing diabetic retinopathy is good. As it is more stable than blood sugar and is not affected by meals, it may be a suitable indicator for diabetic retinopathy.

Keywords

Cut-off value; Diabetic retinopathy; Diagnosis; Glycosylated hemoglobin; Meta-analysis.

Figures