1. Academic Validation
  2. TNF-α inhibitor tanfanercept (HBM9036) improves signs and symptoms of dry eye in a phase 2 trial in the controlled adverse environment in China

TNF-α inhibitor tanfanercept (HBM9036) improves signs and symptoms of dry eye in a phase 2 trial in the controlled adverse environment in China

  • Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;42(8):2459-2472. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02245-1.
Yanling Dong 1 Shuang Wang 1 Lin Cong 1 Ting Zhang 1 Jun Cheng 1 Nannan Yang 1 Xiaohong Qu 1 Dongfang Li 1 Xueying Zhou 2 Holly Wang 2 Michael Lee 2 Meng Wang 2 Stephen Chen 2 George W Ousler 3 Xiaoxiang Chen 2 Lixin Xie 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, China.
  • 2 Harbour BioMed, Shanghai, China.
  • 3 Ora Inc, Andover, MA, USA.
  • 4 Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, China. lixin_xie@hotmail.com.
Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical safety and efficacy of tanfanercept (HBM9036) ophthalmic solution as a novel treatment for dry eye disease (DED) in a controlled adverse environment (CAE) study conducted in China.

Methods: In a single-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 100 patients received 0.25% tanfanercept, or placebo, twice daily for eight weeks. A mobile international CAE® DE Model was used for patient selection with a standardized challenge endpoint. Primary efficacy endpoint was fluorescein inferior corneal staining score (ICSS) pre- to post-CAE challenge from baseline. Secondary endpoints included Schirmer's Tear Test, Tear-Film Break-Up Time, Ocular Discomfort Score, Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire, total corneal staining score (TCSS), and drop comfort. Signs and symptoms were assessed both pre- and post-CAE to evaluate the efficacy of tanfanercept on both environmental and CAE endpoints.

Results: The tanfanercept treatment group showed improvement in ICSS pre- to post-CAE change from baseline scores when compared to placebo (- 0.61 ± 0.11 and - 0.54 ± 0.11, respectively; mean difference = 0.07, p = 0.65). TCSS pre-post-CAE change from baseline scores was also in favor of active when compared to placebo (- 1.03 ± 0.21 and - 0.67 ± 0.21, respectively; mean difference = 0.37, p = 0.23). Schirmer's score improvement was demonstrated in favor of active (1.87 ± 0.62 mm) as compared to placebo (1.28 ± 0.62 mm; mean difference = 0.59 mm, p = 0.50). Change from baseline in mean Tear-Film Break-up Time favored active treatment over placebo (mean difference = 1.21 s, p = 0.45). Notably, the tanfanercept showed more obvious benefits for each DED sign in a subgroup of subjects ≥ 35 years of age. Tanfanercept was well tolerated with no serious adverse events occurring during the study.

Conclusion: Tanfanercept demonstrated improvements in favor of active as compared to placebo in the signs of DED, being safe and well tolerated. These data support further evaluation of tanfanercept for the treatment of DED in China.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04092907) on September 17, 2019.

Keywords

Controlled adverse environment; Dry eye disease; TNF-TNFR1 inhibitor; Tanfanercept.

Figures
Products