1. Academic Validation
  2. Phase Ib Study of Navicixizumab Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

Phase Ib Study of Navicixizumab Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer

  • J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2568-2577. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01801.
Siqing Fu 1 Bradley R Corr 2 Kerry Culm-Merdek 3 Colleen Mockbee 3 Hagop Youssoufian 3 Robert Stagg 4 R Wendel Naumann 5 Robert M Wenham 6 Rafael D Rosengarten 7 Laura Benjamin 3 Erika Paige Hamilton 8 9 Kathleen N Moore 8 10
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • 2 University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO.
  • 3 OncXerna Therapeutics Inc, Waltham, MA.
  • 4 OncoMed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Redwood City, CA.
  • 5 Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
  • 6 Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
  • 7 Genialis Inc, Boston, MA.
  • 8 Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
  • 9 Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN.
  • 10 Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK.
Abstract

Purpose: This phase Ib study evaluated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus navicixizumab, a bispecific antiangiogenic antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor and delta-like ligand 4, against platinum-resistant ovarian Cancer.

Patients and methods: This open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalation and -expansion study included 44 patients with previously treated, recurrent, platinum-resistant grade 2/3 ovarian Cancer. Treatment was intravenous navicixizumab (3 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 0, 7, and 14 of 28-day cycles). The primary and secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of navicixizumab plus paclitaxel. An RNA-based diagnostic panel was retrospectively used to test the hypothesis that tumors with high angiogenesis or immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment (TME) subtypes (biomarker-positive) are more likely to respond to navicixizumab than those with immune-active/-desert TME subtypes (biomarker-negative). RNA expression was analyzed in available pretreatment tumor tissue to classify 33 patients' TME subtypes, and TME panel findings were correlated with tumor response.

Results: The dose-escalation cohorts enrolled patients at navicixizumab doses of 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 3) and 4 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 2); 3 mg/kg was selected for expansion (n = 39). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (6.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.5%). Pulmonary hypertension occurred in 18.2% (grade 1-2). The overall objective response rate was 43.2% (95% CI, 28.3 to 59.0): 33.3% (95% CI, 17.3 to 52.8) in patients previously treated with bevacizumab, 64.3% (95% CI, 35.1 to 87.2) in bevacizumab-naive patients, and 62% (95% CI, 31.6 to 86.1) in biomarker-positive patients. The median duration of response was 6 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable).

Conclusion: Navicixizumab plus paclitaxel demonstrated promising clinical activity in bevacizumab-treated and -naive patients with platinum-resistant ovarian Cancer, with manageable toxicity.

Figures
Products