1. Academic Validation
  2. Improved safety margin for embryotoxicity in rats for the new endoperoxide artefenomel (OZ439) as compared to artesunate

Improved safety margin for embryotoxicity in rats for the new endoperoxide artefenomel (OZ439) as compared to artesunate

  • Birth Defects Res. 2018 Apr 17;110(7):553-578. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1170.
Robert L Clark 1 Tammye L Edwards 2 Monica Longo 3 Joseph Kinney 4 Don K Walker 5 Jon Rhodes 6 Sally A Clode 6 Thomas Rückle 7 Timothy Wells 7 Nicole Andenmatten 7 Anna Christine Huber 8
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Artemis Pharmaceutical Research, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • 2 Charles River Laboratories, Ashland, Ohio.
  • 3 Accelera S.r.l, Nerviano, Italy.
  • 4 Pharmaron UK, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom.
  • 5 Broadstairs, United Kingdom.
  • 6 Covance Laboratories Ltd, Reproduction Toxicology, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
  • 7 Medicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 8 Huber ToxPath Consulting, Ambler, Pennsylvania.
Abstract

Background: Combination medicines including an artemisinin are the mainstay of antimalarial therapy. Artemisinins are potent embryotoxicants in animal species due to their trioxane moiety.

Methods: As part of its development, the new synthetic trioxolane antimalarial artefenomel (OZ439) was tested in rat whole embryo culture and in rat embryo-fetal toxicity studies with dosing throughout organogenesis or with a single dose on Gestational Day (GD) 12. The single-dose studies included groups treated with artesunate to allow a direct comparison of the embryotoxicity of the two antimalarials and included toxicokinetics hematology and histological examination of embryos. In addition, the distribution of artefenomel-related material in plasma was determined after the administration of 14 C-artefenomel.

Results: Artefenomel and artesunate showed similar patterns of embryotoxicity including cardiovascular defects and resorption with a steep dose-response. They both also caused a depletion of circulating embryonic erythroblasts both in vitro and in vivo and decreases in maternal reticulocyte count. However, artefenomel was ∼250-fold less potent than the active metabolite of artesunate (dihydroartemisinin) as an embryotoxicant in vitro. The safety margin (based on AUC) for artefenomel administered on GD 12 was approximately 100-fold greater than that for artesunate. Also, unlike artesunate, artefenomel was not a selective developmental toxicant.

Conclusions: The lesser embryotoxicity of artefenomel is likely linked to its original design which included two blocking side groups that had been introduced to lower the reactivity with ferrous iron. Our data support the hypothesis that artefenomel's improved safety margin is linked to a lower potential for inhibiting heme biosynthesis in embryonic erythroblasts.

Keywords

Artefenomel; artesunate; embryo; embryotoxicity; heme biosynthesis; rat; safety margin.

Figures
Products